Hi Sean, Prioritization was layered on top of the existing activeMQ storage solutions, so the ability to optimize was somewhat limited.
thanks, Rob On 8 November 2012 01:26, sdonovan_uk <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the expectation for queue size and performance when using > prioritization? > > On a queue that has prioritization enabled, if you have more than 60,000 > messages, performance **plummets** -- approximately 10ms per each > additional > 1000 messages (timed on a modern Windows server). > > I find that odd, given that prioritization could be (mostly?) handled on > queue-write, not read. > > Is this expected, or a bug? > > Sean > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Queue-prioritization-tp4658991.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
