I think the console should be part of the main distribution. They should be released together. Release early, release often.
On Saturday, January 25, 2014, Robert Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > > The recent poll [1] and discussions [2] around what to do with the current > ActiveMQ web console demonstrated there’s a mix bag of views. There are > developers who passionately believe that the current Web Console is a large > technical debt on the project, hasn’t been actively developed for years and > is a security risk - whilst others believe it benefits users immensely to > have such a web console available. > > What I would like to propose is that the Web Console is moved to a sub > project of ActiveMQ - where those interested in maintaining and developing > it can work independently of the ActiveMQ broker release. Ideally there > would be collaboration - so that the Web console could be released in the > same time frame as every new minor and major release of the broker. > However, having it as a sub project will also allow for it to be released > independently - so that if folks want to iterate releases of the web > console whilst they improve it or to fix issues as they arise they can. It > also has the benefit of freeing up ActiveMQ developers who want to > concentrate on the core broker functionality. > > This is a compromise, but I believe its the best way forward. What do you > guys think ? > > thanks, > > Rob > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg37711.html > [2] > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Remove-the-old-ActiveMQ-Console-td4675925.html > > Rob Davies > ———————— > Red Hat, Inc > http://hawt.io - #dontcha > Twitter: rajdavies > Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >
