+1. Agree. Simple and clear.
Hadrian
On 01/25/2014 03:36 PM, James Carman wrote:
I think the console should be part of the main distribution. They should
be released together. Release early, release often.
On Saturday, January 25, 2014, Robert Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
The recent poll [1] and discussions [2] around what to do with the current
ActiveMQ web console demonstrated there’s a mix bag of views. There are
developers who passionately believe that the current Web Console is a large
technical debt on the project, hasn’t been actively developed for years and
is a security risk - whilst others believe it benefits users immensely to
have such a web console available.
What I would like to propose is that the Web Console is moved to a sub
project of ActiveMQ - where those interested in maintaining and developing
it can work independently of the ActiveMQ broker release. Ideally there
would be collaboration - so that the Web console could be released in the
same time frame as every new minor and major release of the broker.
However, having it as a sub project will also allow for it to be released
independently - so that if folks want to iterate releases of the web
console whilst they improve it or to fix issues as they arise they can. It
also has the benefit of freeing up ActiveMQ developers who want to
concentrate on the core broker functionality.
This is a compromise, but I believe its the best way forward. What do you
guys think ?
thanks,
Rob
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg37711.html
[2]
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Remove-the-old-ActiveMQ-Console-td4675925.html
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
