It sounds great ! +1
Regards JB On 07/08/2014 04:31 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
Hi all, My name is Clebert Suconic, I'm the project lead for the HornetQ JMS broker (http://hornetq.jboss.org/). The HornetQ team is currently in the planning phase for the next release of the broker and we've been thinking about whether it would make sense for us to collaborate more closely with the ActiveMQ community. There is a lot of overlap in the capabilities of the two brokers today and it strikes us that it would be beneficial to both communities for us to join forces to build one truly great JMS broker rather than spend our time duplicating efforts on both brokers. ActiveMQ has a great community of developers and users and it'd be great to be able to consolidate our work there. My understanding is that the Apollo sub-project aimed to provide a basis for the next generation of ActiveMQ, addressing some of the current limitations. Perhaps HornetQ could be an alternative. HornetQ has some good performance and scalability numbers as well as support for JMS 2.0. It already supports STOMP today and adding support for OpenWire would be straight-forward and would provide continuity for existing clients. Essentially, the goal could be to combine the existing flexibility of ActiveMQ with the performance of HornetQ. Anyway, these are just some initial ideas, for now I'm really just interested to know how the ActiveMQ community would feel about a donation of the HornetQ codebase. Thanks and best regards, Clebert.
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
