Tomcat has had complete re-writes. That's what major ver number change can mean.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:30 PM, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing I see different here from other project major version bumps - we're > still talking a complete rewrite. With something like Tomcat 7 to Tomcat 8, > there's still a reasonable expectation that the knowledge carried from > working with Tomcat 7 carries forward to Tomcat 8 (e.g. the artifacts are > likely to have the same purposes; config files are likely to carry the same > name, etc). While major versions will break some of that, a good amount > usually remains. > > For that reason, I'm on the fence about the -M1 idea. I like the > distinguishing name approach. > > How about activemq-ng (ng = next-gen)? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693549.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
