I don't think that's an issue. We will provide a clear path for users from 5 to 6 before we move to final.
We already added OpenWire, Auto-creation of destinations and other things that would operate similar to 5. and we have more work to do, which we can get there if we work together. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:19 PM, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > A complete rewrite means users need to carefully look at what's there and > what's not, and those of us building the software need to put in extra > effort to even figure that out ourselves. It also means starting over on > learning the software (how to install, configure, deploy, operate, monitor, > alert, etc). > > A major version bump on projects may involve refactoring and reworking > significant parts of the code, and when it does, it's clear to the > developers what has been changed and lost from the prior release. Then it's > easy to document. (Like this: http://tomcat.apache.org/migration-8.html). > > If we had a list of all ActiveMQ features, and the state of those features > in HornetQ (e.g. implemented, partially implemented, won't implement, etc), > that would certainly go a long way to furthering the entire discussion. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693553.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
