Agreed. Preventing the existing ActiveMQ code base from moving from the 5.x to a 6.x version is a bad thing.
We already have violated the rules of semantic versioning because of this (e.g. the renaming of all MBeans that was not backward-compatible). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693768.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
