Art, what would stop the current trunk jumping from 5.x to 7.x and skipping 6, if the need arose?
On 24 March 2015 at 20:40, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. > > Preventing the existing ActiveMQ code base from moving from the 5.x to a 6.x > version is a bad thing. > > We already have violated the rules of semantic versioning because of this > (e.g. the renaming of all MBeans that was not backward-compatible). > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693768.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
