Thanks for the response. Very saddened to hear this but expected this to be the response.
By the way, I really appreciated your posts at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-apollo/blob/trunk/apollo-stomp/src/test/scala/org/apache/activemq/apollo/stomp/test/UserOwnershipSecurityFactory.scala#L29 and https://github.com/apache/activemq-apollo/blob/trunk/apollo-stomp/src/test/resources/apollo-stomp-custom-security.xml#L18 As they allowed me to figure out how to do my own custom authorization. See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29424952/dynamic-destination-in-apache-apollo-mq/29527865#29527865 Back to my question: According to https://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html, it appears as if the lessons learned in Apollo would be used to enhance a future ActiveMQ 6 line. Is this still planned? If so will it be something usable by my company by Q4? I have been testing brokers for 3 weeks and Apollo's characteristics are hands down the best. Something was done VERY right. Gratz. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Future-of-Apollo-tp4694644p4694737.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
