Well, I've stopped working on apollo since the community aspects of it did not seem to be getting much traction. If your using it and find any problems with it, please send in patches :) You part of solving the community problem and help maintain and push apollo forward.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, redboy1972 <[email protected]> wrote: > I tested many brokers and am very impressed with the performance > characteristics of Apollo. I work for a large company and the broker is > going to be the backbone of a large infrastructure project. > > The issue is that while Apollo does well in my tests, its future seems > uncertain. Especially being a subproject of a future ActiveMQ 6 release. > > 1) Will there be continued bug fixes should we run into something and for > how long? > 2) Any general timeline for inclusion of Reactor Based Thread Model into > ActiveMQ? > > Our ship timeline is Q4 2015. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Future-of-Apollo-tp4694644.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
