+1 Sounds like you got a good start :) On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> wrote: > Clearly a discussion of this topic needs to be started. I proposed some > actions late last night in a different discussion, so let's just start with > those and couple more I have thought of since: > > * Offering karma to those contributors who have provided enhancements to > ActiveMQ over the years but who have not been offered it yet (for this I am > already working to compile a list of people who have contributed enough > patches that they should be offered karma -- anyone care to help?) > * Publish a list of expectations on the wiki for contributors who are > interested in seeking karma > * Discussing ideas openly via the lists so that *everyone* has the context > that David mentioned > * Working publicly via the lists to foster trust amongst and offer one > another compromises > * Taking the time to include the rest of the community in the discussion by > reflecting the outcome of offline conversions via the lists > * Publish a plan of actions for the 'HornetQ donated code base' (including > Hiram's clarification) > > What other ideas do people have for encouraging diversity? > > Bruce > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
-- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
