- reduce or eliminate the backlog of unapplied/unaccepted/uncommented patches/pull requests
- keep it that way :-) - (maybe) provide hints rather than complete solutions for bugs that don't seem too hard to fix given a starting point as an easy way to start to get involved. I think the above will increase the list of people we'd want to offer karma to. - look at what openejb does :-) So, I haven't compiled any statistics but think that some people have complained about ignored contributions. Ignoring people is kinda asking them to go away, not what we want. thanks david jencks On Apr 17, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> wrote: > Clearly a discussion of this topic needs to be started. I proposed some > actions late last night in a different discussion, so let's just start with > those and couple more I have thought of since: > > * Offering karma to those contributors who have provided enhancements to > ActiveMQ over the years but who have not been offered it yet (for this I am > already working to compile a list of people who have contributed enough > patches that they should be offered karma -- anyone care to help?) > * Publish a list of expectations on the wiki for contributors who are > interested in seeking karma > * Discussing ideas openly via the lists so that *everyone* has the context > that David mentioned > * Working publicly via the lists to foster trust amongst and offer one > another compromises > * Taking the time to include the rest of the community in the discussion by > reflecting the outcome of offline conversions via the lists > * Publish a plan of actions for the 'HornetQ donated code base' (including > Hiram's clarification) > > What other ideas do people have for encouraging diversity? > > Bruce > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
