On 21/04/15 04:29, artnaseef wrote:
I didn't even catch up on this entire thread, so forgive me if I missed
something. It's wearing me out - again.
+1. I understand that those folks on this thread are particularly
passionate and hence why things have escalated to this point. I get the
impression that everyone on this thread wants the best for ActiveMQ.
This will not happen if people start making accusations, falling out and
start battling. Once this happens the issue at hand stops being about
the "good" and starts becoming about the "win" (or not losing face).
Please, all, put differences aside and be objective about the issue in hand.
Look, it's last minute. No quick fixes are coming.
There are some good things happening now, but they won't fix things today or
tomorrow. Given the timing and the threat of board action, it's natural to
question sincerity.
Let's get the board report finished.
Hiram - please add to the board report Hadrian's belief that the best path
forward for the new code is to take it to the incubator. Mention that at
least one other board member feels that path is likely the best one forward
- especially given the problems currently faced by the ActiveMQ community.
Just state it as fact - that it's the opinion of individual PMC members.
+1. Please just add that this is the opinion of some PMC and community
members.
Perhaps what is needed is a clear, concise representation of the
argument backing up this view. Hadrian and/or Tracy perhaps you can
provide a summary of your views that can be included in the report.
Hiram is not best suited to write this on your behalf.
To balance this argument, we also need a clear, concise representation
of the opinion of those who feel that ActiveMQ Artemis should not go
into incubator, Hiram perhaps you can provide this?
Laying the two arguments side by side, void of emotion should make the
two stances clear. The request to have representation in this report is
a reasonable one, and in my opinion should be addressed.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Special-Board-Report-tp4695140p4695336.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
