On Apr 20, 2015 9:36 PM, "Clebert Suconic" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes. Almost exclusively done by the HornetQ team (going by the commit logs and the team page at HornetQ’s website). > >> > > That was done this way because we were getting ready for the IP > Clearance and what was needed for the first release. > As part of the IP clearance process we were supposed to get rid of > Cat-X dependencies (the JMS API JAR was LGPL for instance... so we > needed to find a replacement which was completed by John Ament here.
Its worth pointing out in my opinion that even though I've been named a JBoss Champion recently, RedHat doesnt pay my salary and had nothing to do with that API JAR. John > > >> We incorporated OpenWire, changed how connection factories are > >> serialized and persisted to be exactly the same as what's done on > >> ActiveMQ5, the server start was recently changed to be exactly as > >> what's done on Apollo, Documentation was changed around a lot to be > >> consistent with Apache brands... etc.. etc.. etc… > > > > All hard work and looks awesome. Impressive effort. What bothers me is the we part. The we isn’t the ActiveMQ community as a whole, it’s the formerly HornetQ community subset. A shocking lack of diversity on the people front, not the code front. > > > As I said.. that was just the first release... there's a lot more to > be done.. and we have been pretty open about inviting people to join > the effort. > > The open wire implementation for instance is the very first > implementation.. and it needs to be taken further. > > the docs work was a direct conversion of what we had... that was also > part of the IP clearance.
