A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not already on the branch:
AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016 AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321 On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have > > been resolved. I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to > > backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so. > > I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes > don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the fixes > branches. :( As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing to > do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to > take a look. That’s something even non-committers could do and help out > with. In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes or > something to pull back and got exactly one. Not a good sign. > > > This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release > > time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time. > > In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or Thursday. If > anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know. > > Thanks! > Dan > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at > >> the > >>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0. > >> > >> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working? > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Paul > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out > >>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week. There’s not a lot of fixes > on > >> the > >>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support > >> running > >>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4. > >>>> > >>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get > >> them > >>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes > >> and I > >>>> can take a look and get them merged. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >> > >> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >
