Can you add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5754 to the list?
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac about.me/dejanb On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for this list. I’ve pulled these back (along with a couple others > needed to get these to compile). The tests all pass. > > I’ll likely do the 5.11.2 builds tomorrow morning. If anyone has anything > else they need, let me know ASAP! > > Thanks! > Dan > > > > > On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Shannon < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not > > already on the branch: > > > > AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d > > AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db > > AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016 > > AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a > > AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that > have > >>> been resolved. I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to > >>> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do > so. > >> > >> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes > >> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the > fixes > >> branches. :( As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing > to > >> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to > >> take a look. That’s something even non-committers could do and help > out > >> with. In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes > or > >> something to pull back and got exactly one. Not a good sign. > >> > >>> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release > >>> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time. > >> > >> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or Thursday. If > >> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master > at > >>>> the > >>>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0. > >>>> > >>>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working? > >>>> > >>>> Dan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Paul > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release > out > >>>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week. There’s not a lot of fixes > >> on > >>>> the > >>>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support > >>>> running > >>>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please > get > >>>> them > >>>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git > hashes > >>>> and I > >>>>>> can take a look and get them merged. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >> > >> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >
