I thought that ACKs were supposed to be transactional per the spec. On Thursday, February 18, 2016, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
> TBH I don't remember what Hiram (et all) wrote on the spec. It will be > a bug depending on what's said at the spec. > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Lionel Cons <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > The Artemis 1.2.0 doc contains: > > > > | Message acknowledgements are not transactional. The ACK frame can not > be part > > | of a transaction (it will be ignored if its transaction header is > set). > > > > Is this a design decision (meaning that this behaviour will not change) > or is > > this considered as a bug (that will be fixed at some point)? > > > > In the latter case, it would be good to create a Jira issue for this to > track > > its progress (I didn't find any related issue in Jira). > > > > Cheers, > > > > Lionel > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
