> TBH I don't remember what Hiram (et all) wrote on the spec. It will be
> a bug depending on what's said at the spec.

The spec says:

 | Optionally, a transaction header MAY be specified, indicating that the 
message acknowledgment SHOULD be part of the named transaction.

So, strictly speaking, this is only a SHOULD, not a MUST.


However, AFAIK, ActiveMQ 5.x does support transactional acks so, if you aim at 
good compatibility with ActiveMQ 5.x, Artemis should really also support them...

Cheers,

Lionel

Reply via email to