I'm looking at a git log between 1.4.0 and HEAD, and from what I see, there are a few improvements that could be translated as either features/improvements or bugs.
A few tweaks on the wording could change them into either bug or fix... e.g: Reloading Divert Support - Feature, Diverts are not reloaded = Bug The only real feature I could find so far was your commit here: commit 9163c679ef21e70ba94f54c9a1bed9a12ad6bcca Author: John D. Ament <[email protected]> Date: Sun Jul 31 22:12:50 2016 -0400 ARTEMIS-756 introduce CDI based integration for Artemis. Includes integration tests on both Weld and OWB. If you'd like I can call it 1.5.0 based on this change. it's up to you really since it's your commit. WDYT? On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:09 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a changelog of whats going in? If its all bug fixes, 1.4.1 makes > sense. if its feature, I would think 1.5.0 is more appropriate. > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:52 AM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I want to make a release early next week. (as I have pointed a few weeks >> ago). >> >> >> I will release from master... there are a few new packages added >> around OSGI, but I was still considering calling 1.4.1, and reserve >> 1.5.0 for a few more major features that will change the broker >> itself. >> >> >> If no objections I will call it 1.4.1, but I wouldn't mind calling it >> 1.5.0 if anyone objects. >> -- Clebert Suconic
