I'm looking at a git log between 1.4.0 and HEAD, and from what I see,
there are a few improvements that could be translated as either
features/improvements or bugs.

A few tweaks on the wording could change them into either bug or fix... e.g:

Reloading Divert Support - Feature,
Diverts are not reloaded = Bug

The only real feature I could find so far was your commit here:

commit 9163c679ef21e70ba94f54c9a1bed9a12ad6bcca
Author: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
Date:   Sun Jul 31 22:12:50 2016 -0400
    ARTEMIS-756 introduce CDI based integration for Artemis.  Includes
integration tests on both Weld and OWB.

If you'd like I can call it 1.5.0 based on this change. it's up to you
really since it's your commit. WDYT?

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:09 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Is there a changelog of whats going in? If its all bug fixes, 1.4.1 makes
> sense.  if its feature, I would think 1.5.0 is more appropriate.
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:52 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I want to make a release early next week. (as I have pointed a few weeks
>> ago).
>> I will release from master... there are a few new packages added
>> around OSGI, but I was still considering calling 1.4.1, and reserve
>> 1.5.0 for a few more major features that will change the broker
>> itself.
>> If no objections I will call it 1.4.1, but I wouldn't mind calling it
>> 1.5.0 if anyone objects.

Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to