+1 On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.com> wrote: > +1 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Shannon" <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> > To: dev@activemq.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:45:41 AM > Subject: [DISCUSS] LevelDB deprecation > > Hi Everyone, > > I just wanted to ask what people think about officially deprecating LevelDB > in our 5.x broker and update our documentation to say that it is no longer > recommended. We can leave it in the code base for people who are still > using it but discourage its use. > > The main reason is that KahaDB continues to be the main focus where bugs > are fixed and not much attention is paid to LevelDB. There seems to be > several issues with corruption (especially with replication) so I don't > think it should be a recommended store unless the stability is sorted out. > Unfortunately nearly every Jira reported against LevelDB goes ignored. > > Now that Artemis exists and supports replication I think the focus should > be primarily on making Artemis the focus for users who need a replicated > store or to encourage the use of something like a shared file system > master/slave setup.
-- Clebert Suconic
