+1

> Am 15.11.2016 um 15:16 schrieb Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.com> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christopher Shannon" <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:45:41 AM
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] LevelDB deprecation
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> I just wanted to ask what people think about officially deprecating LevelDB
>> in our 5.x broker and update our documentation to say that it is no longer
>> recommended.  We can leave it in the code base for people who are still
>> using it but discourage its use.
>> 
>> The main reason is that KahaDB continues to be the main focus where bugs
>> are fixed and not much attention is paid to LevelDB. There seems to be
>> several issues with corruption (especially with replication) so I don't
>> think it should be a recommended store unless the stability is sorted out.
>> Unfortunately nearly every Jira reported against LevelDB goes ignored.
>> 
>> Now that Artemis exists and supports replication I think the focus should
>> be primarily on making Artemis the focus for users who need a replicated
>> store or to encourage the use of something like a shared file system
>> master/slave setup.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to