I think trying to address everything on your list in a single release is probably a little ambitious. However, a major goal for Artemis is to try to fill many of those feature gaps as possible (or at least offer similar features that address the same use cases). It'd be great if your notes were captured in JIRA. We can start adding them incrementally and releasing often.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2016 04:29 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > >> *** Re-sending w/ [DISCUSS] subject tag >> >> Kicking off a discussion on what folks would like to see in 2.0.0 release >> for Artemis. My thought is that we should target ActiveMQ 5.x feature >> parity in an effort to solidify Artemis in the product sense. I will detail >> out specifics from my previous note on 5.x-Artemis feature gaps. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> > So you're looking to get 2.0 out by 2020 then? ;) > > -- > Tim Bish > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >
