On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Christian Schneider <
> ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>
>> I was not implying that the feature parity with ActiveMQ is a marketing
>> goal. I just wanted to show a case where typically in companies marketing
>> pushes for a major release based on a feature set as they think they can
>> sell it better. As an open source project ActiveMQ/Artemis has the luxury
>> to not being pushed by marketing.
>>
>> I currently do not see any bigger breaking API changes
>
> This thread has some more info: http://activemq-dev.markmail.
> org/search/?q=possible%202.0.0#query:possible%202.0.0+page:
> 1+mid:bt5v5z3l7n575vwc+state:results
>
Copy and paste fail...

The Nabble archieve is here:


http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Artemis-addressing-improvements-JMS-component-removal-and-potential-2-0-0-tt4719262.html


but I am not so much into the Artemis internals. Until now I was only
>> involved in the OSGi support.
>
>
>> I also think it is very good to talk about the upcoming or planned
>> features. I would make the list rather small though as in my experience the
>> actual features going into the code often differ from the plannings as
>> quite many people are involved at apache projects and the amount of work
>> they put in often can not be predicted well. So I would only look one or
>> two minor versions ahead most of the time.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On 08.12.2016 16:50, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>>
>>> Christian-
>>>
>>> Are there any features or API breaking changes you'd like to see? My #1
>>> goal is to kick off a conversation.
>>>
>>> I don't think setting goals like "feature parity w/ ActiveMQ 5.x" is a
>>> marketing goal. I think it is a user-centric goal. Users use features. For
>>> Artemis to be a suitable upgrade for ActiveMQ 5.x, a set of features need
>>> to be present. My intention with this thread is to discuss and prioritize
>>> those features.
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Schneider
>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>
>> Open Source Architect
>> http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to