What about start doing it right after Artemis 2.0.0 is out? Aim it to 2.1.0 (on Artemis, being compatible with AMQ5 (still a question mark on how to do it.. but I"m taking this is a requirement)).
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Christopher Shannon <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes there seemed to be some consensus to build a plugin hosted here at > Apache or to build a new console altogether to support 5.x and Artemis. > And we would keep the existing console until then. > > However, the hold up has always been finding people who have time to work > on it and want to work on it. If someone wants to create a repo and start > working on it that would probably help to get others involved. > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Christian Schneider >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have read the old threads about the web console. >> >> >> >> If I understood correctly then we would like to get rid of the current >> >> activemq web console but need a replacement. There is hawt.io which >> >> functionally would work but which is not compatible from a community >> >> standpoint. >> > >> > My understand was: as long as it looked like an apache console, and >> > not a commercial product belonging to any company it would be ok. >> > >> >> *AND* all of the ActiveMQ/Artemis related bits are written and maintained >> here at Apache as part of this community. How the queues and brokers and >> such are presented to the user is completely under the control of this >> community. >> >> In other words: we don’t take the activemq plugin or whatever they have >> and use it as is. (Unless they want to donate it to this community) >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >> >> -- Clebert Suconic
