For an example of what they did: Look at the attachment on this JIRA raised here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-748
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12830361/Grafana%20%20%20Artemis%20Queues%20%20%20Dashboard.png On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > @CShannon: I saw a few guys from Brazil (Right, @Fabio?), implementing > an awesome interface on top of Artemis using Grafana: > > > https://github.com/grafana/grafana > > > Pretty impressive. :O > > > > If we build a separate repo, we could have scripts for things like > Grafana, or other tools like this!!!! It would rock!!! > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Christopher Shannon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Agreed, having a good user experience should be a high priority and having >> some way to configure a broker and monitor a broker at runtime that is user >> friendly is ideal. If the web console can rely on something like a REST >> service and JMX for data then it will also allow other tools to be built to >> help with management. Besides a web console I also find a command line >> interface based console to be really useful. Being able to quickly run >> commands from a shell to do things such as make configuration changes or >> view metrics is useful because it is fast and can be easily scripted. >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for restoring this discussion. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Clebert Suconic < >>> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > What about start doing it right after Artemis 2.0.0 is out? Aim it to >>> > 2.1.0 (on Artemis, being compatible with AMQ5 (still a question mark >>> > on how to do it.. but I"m taking this is a requirement)). >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Christopher Shannon >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > Yes there seemed to be some consensus to build a plugin hosted here at >>> > > Apache or to build a new console altogether to support 5.x and Artemis. >>> > > And we would keep the existing console until then. >>> > >>> Yes! >>> >>> The console is something I am really passionate about. In my opinion user >>> experience is the number one priority and the lack of any form of console >>> in Artemis is just a disaster. We're really missing a trick here as I >>> think we could build something fantastic for both ActiveMQ 5.x and Artemis. >>> >>> > >>> > > However, the hold up has always been finding people who have time to >>> work >>> > > on it and want to work on it. If someone wants to create a repo and >>> > start >>> > > working on it that would probably help to get others involved. >>> > >>> I'm more than happy to take this on and get a repository created and put a >>> basic framework in place. This should get the ball rolling. >>> >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Clebert Suconic < >>> > [email protected]> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Christian Schneider >>> > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >> I have read the old threads about the web console. >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> If I understood correctly then we would like to get rid of the >>> > current >>> > >> >> activemq web console but need a replacement. There is hawt.io >>> which >>> > >> >> functionally would work but which is not compatible from a >>> community >>> > >> >> standpoint. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > My understand was: as long as it looked like an apache console, and >>> > >> > not a commercial product belonging to any company it would be ok. >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> *AND* all of the ActiveMQ/Artemis related bits are written and >>> > maintained >>> > >> here at Apache as part of this community. How the queues and brokers >>> > and >>> > >> such are presented to the user is completely under the control of this >>> > >> community. >>> > >> >>> > >> In other words: we don’t take the activemq plugin or whatever they >>> have >>> > >> and use it as is. (Unless they want to donate it to this community) >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> Daniel Kulp >>> > >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >>> > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Clebert Suconic >>> > >>> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
