As you guys have seen, my work now arrived on master. Any further improvements now won't break any compatibility or anything.
After this I think it's time to put something out and keep working on master as usual. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > although maybe giving this power to the user may change certain > semantics? things that are supposed to run fast could eventually take > much longer. > > > But the user would be in control. > > > Dunno, that's splitting the conversation on the 2.x discussion already. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Clebert Suconic > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The two properties are pretty straight-forward, and I personally don't see >>> how making them use the same time unit makes things simpler. Granting such >> >> you're right.. I was just trying to understand Jiri's comment, and not >> actually make an evaluation on the feature. >> >> <idea> If we were to make any changes, I would change all properties >> that refer to time to also include the time unit on them. That way the >> user would be more free to make any changes. </idea> >> >> >> >> Example: <timeout>5s</timeout> >> >> >> >> >> Just an idea though! >> >> >> >> If not, I would keep it as is... as it wouldn't bring much value otherwise. > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
