Or even (as we use address now)

> byte[] serialize(String address, Object o)
> 
> Object deserialize(String address, byte[] bytes)



Sent from my iPhone

> On 31 May 2017, at 03:00, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> I think having just a SerDe interface for payload handling separate from a 
> general interceptor / client side plugin, is beneficial as then it keeps the 
> logic for serialsation well encapsulated. And also cleaner if we need to do 
> anything (eg sending it as a bytesmessags with a header flag)
> 
> I see this very much like difference in kafka where you have payload 
> serialisation (serdes) and custom-plugin (interceptors)
> 
> Also having just a serde makes interface for people to implement and care 
> about much simpler. Eg this is almost the interface I would expect:
> 
> byte[] serialize(Destination destination, Object o)
> 
> Object deserialize(Destination destination, byte[] bytes)
> 
> Nice and simple to implement without having to care about anything else.
> 
> Cheers
> Mike
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 30 May 2017, at 23:18, Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Michael-
>> 
>> +1 dealing with bytes messages is preferred to object messages and custom 
>> object SerDes is super useful.
>> 
>> What do you think about considering a generic client-side plugin approach vs 
>> just a payload handler? 
>> 
>>> On May 30, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Michael André Pearce 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If present then this would be used to serialise the Object instead of the 
>>> default, and subsequently create/convert to a BytesMessage, with a header 
>>> set to denote it was custom serialised.
>> 

Reply via email to