Jms api dictates class set in object message to be serializable.
> On 31 May 2017, at 22:37, Timothy Nodine <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should the interface require the underlying class to be Serializable? One use > case might be to provide serialization to classes that aren't natively > serializable. > > > > Michael André Pearce wrote: >> To help discussion, >> A very very basic implementation just to simulate the idea. >> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/CustomSerialisation >> >> <https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/CustomSerialisation> >> >> n.b. doesn’t fully compile is just pseudo impl, nor doesn’t include bits as >> discussed below like map/change type to a byte message for compatibility, >> nor media type idea. >> >> Cheers >> Mike >> >
