Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1515#discussion_r137457338
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/utils/critical/CriticalMeasure.java
---
@@ -17,28 +17,39 @@
package org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.critical;
-import org.jboss.logging.Logger;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongFieldUpdater;
-public class CriticalMeasure {
+final class CriticalMeasure {
--- End diff --
It is a good point for sure, but I agree only on the second half: is out of
scope for the change so I can push a different PR just with it (and for the
atomic changes too I can say).
For the first half I do not agree: is not a personal taste, but the
explicit declaration of the original intent. That class wasn't designed to be
extended or used in other points in the code.
---
