I've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1437 with a patch for the website around fixing this and some other issues, plus splitting the older releases out to their own page, if folks could take a look and see what they think.
Robbie On 18 September 2017 at 16:58, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > The links for some of the older 1.5.x releases on the site seem to be > broken also, still pointing to the main dist release or mirrors rather > than the archive where the files are now. > > The download page should also be linking to the checksums, but > currently only links to the signatures. > > On 18 September 2017 at 16:42, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 11:35 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>> >>> Talking about releases... I know there's a policy to archive >>> releases... Tim Bish had once archived a couple of ActiveMQ >>> releases... >>> >>> >>> It's time to archive a few in Artemis now. (...will look for docs) >>> >>> >>> I could do it next week.. unless someone do it before me. (I'm not >>> really working this week) >> >> >> You should be archiving the previous release on each new release. Archiving >> is done by removing the release from dist.apache.org and updating the >> website download links for that release to point to archive.apache.org >> >> The current dist site appears to not have been cleaned up, so you need to >> remove 1.5.4, 2.0.0, 2.1.0 and 2.2.0 and update your download links to be in >> compliance with Apache processes. >> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Robbie Gemmell >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yep. I'm not sure exactly how much longer than this it has been the >>>> recommendation, but after noticing we started swapping each component >>>> at Qpid over to using SHA512 checksums in March as they each get >>>> released. Most have changed over now, though still a couple final less >>>> frequently released bits left to go. >>>> >>>> If people are concerned at dropping the SHA1 outright we could always >>>> have both, perhaps for a time as a form of switchover period. I don't >>>> personally think thats really necessary. >>>> >>>> Robbie >>>> >>>> On 15 September 2017 at 21:18, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 09/15/2017 03:59 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just for my education. Why you Decided to drop downloading the .sha1 >>>>>> and >>>>>> are creating a new one? >>>>>> >>>>>> All the other downloads we have are using the .sha1? >> >> >> -- >> Tim Bish >> twitter: @tabish121 >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >>
