+1 Have performed some standard load and latency tests on physical servers, no negative regressions seen in gathered metrics.
Also performed some basic failover cases in ha setup. Have checked with both Artemis core and amqp client no new issues seen some historic resolved. Thanks Justin for the release :) Sent from my iPhone > On 3 Nov 2017, at 00:41, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > Ran a few examples and tests. checked tags... > > Nice one Justin! > >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 11/01/2017 02:53 AM, Justin Bertram wrote: >>> >>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0 release. >>> >>> We had these new features and improvements added as part of 2.4.0: >>> >>> [ARTEMIS-534] - Allow JMX configuration from broker.xml >>> [ARTEMIS-1447] - JDBC NodeManager to support JDBC HA Shared Store >>> [ARTEMIS-1428] - Allow configuration of max frame payload length for STOMP >>> web-socket >>> [ARTEMIS-1463] - Implement rbac of management objects >>> >>> The release notes can be found here: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12341540&projectId=12315920 >>> >>> Source and binary distributions can be found here: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>> orgapacheactivemq-1153/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/2.4.0/ >>> >>> The Maven repository is here: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1153 >>> >>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples: >>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking- >>> guide/validating-releases.html >>> >>> The source tag: >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis. >>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.4.0 >>> >>> I will update the website after the vote has passed. >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0 >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> Here's my +1 >>> >>> >>> Justin >>> >> +1 >> >> * Validated signatures and checksums >> * checked for license and notice files in the archives >> * Created new broker instance from the binary package and ran it, check that >> web console worked >> * Ran some Qpid JMS client examples against the running broker >> * Built from source and ran some of the tests including the AMQP tests in >> the integration suite. >> * Checked using mvn apache-rat:check that no missing license headers were >> found. >> >> >> -- >> Tim Bish >> twitter: @tabish121 >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
