clebertsuconic wrote >> Lets make this project work in harmony for everyone so we can work >> towards >> consensus for what is AMQ6 and when. > > Harmony and Unanimous consensus is something pretty rare in humanity.
Thats a pretty sad view. Nobody said unanimous. Harmony is certainly not that hard. But where I think the elephant is where those votes are aligned. That should be a much bigger concern. clebertsuconic wrote > If you help promote Artemis, work towards the roadmap.. and > everything.. there's still the question: > > > 1 year, 2 years, 3 years from now... aren't we going to be back to this > square? > > > I just want to know the terms ahead of time.. is this fixable? I > believe one year from now.. we will -1s from usually -1s people, no > matter how complete we are on the Roadmap. Who can answer that? I think minimally it needs to be easily migrated. At this stage it certainly cannot... at least not from my experience. We cannot turn our back on the majority of this community who just so happens to use ActiveMQ 5. Its also kind of sad that you have relinquished to thinking -1s are -1s forever. I believe I told you point blank I'm all for Artemis being AMQ6... "When its ready". What is ready? It was stated many times in this thread. I believe the -1s in this thread all said the same thing. Get more people using it and have a good compatible migration path so we can be consistent with all of our major version releases. Artemis is getting what it wants. More prominence and support from the AMQ project and a commitment to migration path. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
