I'm sorry but I need to jump in here. The rhetoric in this discussion is not only unnecessary but it is also highly unproductive. Instead of resorting to petty disagreements, let's stop responding to this thread and find a more productive topic on which to focus your energy.
Knock it off and go write some code. Bruce On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeff- Lol.. whatever and you have never partnered with Red Hat? > > > > On 12/6/17 5:43 PM, jgenender wrote: > >> I'm sorry... just when we move forward, we take 2 steps back. >> >> >> Matt Pavlovich-2 wrote >> >>> I agree. I don't work for Red Hat either, but we do a ton of ActiveMQ >>> work and have products that support ActiveMQ. Artemis looks to be the >>> future and working to align the community to that end is a good thing >>> imo. >>> >> No... you don't work for Red Hat, but a solid business partner for sure! >> No >> connections! >> >> https://mediadriver.com/red-hat/ >> >> Come on guys.... lets stop the games... time to move on, no? This is >> getting kind of out of hand... don't you agree? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404. >> html >> > > -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
