Some people are capable of working towards a goal without a vote.
Back in the day hackers would get together get some beers and with a
"wouldn't it be f* awesome if..." in mind would put something together
quickly, talk with unfakeable passion about the stuff and help other
geeks be successful with it.
Now it's about PR and visions.
Oh well...
Hadrian
On 12/06/2017 05:53 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
I agree. I don't work for Red Hat either, but we do a ton of ActiveMQ
work and have products that support ActiveMQ. Artemis looks to be the
future and working to align the community to that end is a good thing imo.
+1 vote for the 'let's work to make it ActiveMQ 6'
On 12/6/17 3:45 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
I think the votes are aligned with Artemis.
I do not work for RedHat. To have a broad brush statement like that
everyone who voted +1 must work for the same company, please don’t
tarnish my vote with the same brush.
I work for a company that uses ActiveMQ as one of its message brokers
and see it’s future in Artemis.
Sent from my iPhone
On 6 Dec 2017, at 21:34, jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote:
clebertsuconic wrote
Lets make this project work in harmony for everyone so we can work
towards
consensus for what is AMQ6 and when.
Harmony and Unanimous consensus is something pretty rare in humanity.
Thats a pretty sad view. Nobody said unanimous. Harmony is
certainly not
that hard. But where I think the elephant is where those votes are
aligned.
That should be a much bigger concern.
clebertsuconic wrote
If you help promote Artemis, work towards the roadmap.. and
everything.. there's still the question:
1 year, 2 years, 3 years from now... aren't we going to be back to this
square?
I just want to know the terms ahead of time.. is this fixable? I
believe one year from now.. we will -1s from usually -1s people, no
matter how complete we are on the Roadmap.
Who can answer that? I think minimally it needs to be easily
migrated. At
this stage it certainly cannot... at least not from my experience. We
cannot turn our back on the majority of this community who just so
happens
to use ActiveMQ 5.
Its also kind of sad that you have relinquished to thinking -1s are -1s
forever. I believe I told you point blank I'm all for Artemis being
AMQ6...
"When its ready". What is ready? It was stated many times in this
thread.
I believe the -1s in this thread all said the same thing. Get more
people
using it and have a good compatible migration path so we can be
consistent
with all of our major version releases.
Artemis is getting what it wants. More prominence and support from
the AMQ
project and a commitment to migration path.
--
Sent from:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
