On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Arthur Naseef <[email protected]> wrote: > On the providing core persistence - that is core to Artemis, and Artemis > provides a reasonable solution to that problem out-of-the-box. There are > dozens, if not hundreds, or alternatives we could add as near-storage. > There needs to be a clear line on that front. Not sure I understand why > anyone wants JDBC access to their messaging solution internal storage in my > not-so-humble opinion. They (JDBC and messaging) serve two very different > patterns and problem-sets.
JDBC is already a feature.. I'm just providing easier configuration out of the box with a simple CLI tool. We are not discussin if we should have JDBC or not. We had to add because users *wanted it*. No other reason. as they say.. the "customer" is always right :)
