Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
Please take a look here:
```
2018-01-22 17:28:59,899 WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
Error during message dispatch: java.lang.RuntimeException: null
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireMessage.toCore(OpenwireMessage.java:787)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireMessage.toCore(OpenwireMessage.java:779)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenWireMessageConverter.toAMQMessage(OpenWireMessageConverter.java:454)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenWireMessageConverter.createMessageDispatch(OpenWireMessageConverter.java:435)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.amq.AMQConsumer.handleDeliver(AMQConsumer.java:222)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.amq.AMQSession.sendMessage(AMQSession.java:276)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ServerConsumerImpl.deliverStandardMessage(ServerConsumerImpl.java:1091)
[artemis-server-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ServerConsumerImpl.proceedDeliver(ServerConsumerImpl.java:460)
[artemis-server-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.proceedDeliver(QueueImpl.java:2763)
[artemis-server-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.deliver(QueueImpl.java:2247)
[artemis-server-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.access$1900(QueueImpl.java:106)
[artemis-server-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl$DeliverRunner.run(QueueImpl.java:3021)
[artemis-server-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:42)
[artemis-commons-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:31)
[artemis-commons-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase.executePendingTasks(ProcessorBase.java:66)
[artemis-commons-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_102]
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_102]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [rt.jar:1.8.0_102]
Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: null
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:542) [rt.jar:1.8.0_102]
at java.lang.Integer.valueOf(Integer.java:766) [rt.jar:1.8.0_102]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.collections.TypedProperties.getIntProperty(TypedProperties.java:225)
[artemis-commons-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireMessage.getIntProperty(OpenwireMessage.java:681)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireMessage.getIntProperty(OpenwireMessage.java:600)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireCoreConverter.toCore(OpenwireCoreConverter.java:74)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireConverter.toCore(OpenwireConverter.java:42)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire.OpenwireMessage.toCore(OpenwireMessage.java:785)
[artemis-openwire-protocol-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:]
... 17 more
```
I've built up a 1 producer 1 consumer test vs 1 not durable JMS queue and
I'm getting it.
The idea seems good as @clebertsuconic as shown me but need to address
these issues first :+1:
---
