Github user RaiSaurabh commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r165302018
  
    --- Diff: 
artemis-protocols/artemis-openwire-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/openwire/OpenWireConverter.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.openwire;
    +
    +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.ICoreMessage;
    +import 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessageObjectPools;
    +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.protocol.MessageConverter;
    +
    +public class OpenWireConverter implements 
MessageConverter<OpenwireMessage> {
    +
    +   private static final OpenWireConverter theInstance = new 
OpenWireConverter();
    +   private OpenWireConverter() {
    +   }
    +
    +   public static OpenWireConverter getInstance() {
    +      return theInstance;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public OpenwireMessage fromCore(ICoreMessage coreMessage) throws 
Exception {
    --- End diff --
    
    Ok, @michaelandrepearce I will refractor that. Since this was named like 
this previously I thought not to change it. As after what you suggested this 
was bugging me too.


---

Reply via email to