Github user gtully commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1820 Hope we don't lose the pictures, but this PR as it stands is too simplistic and the use case is already covered by a shared durable sub. the prefixed fqqn will be the way to go if we need to improve in this area. https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.3.0/address-model.html#configuring-a-prefix-to-connect-to-a-specific-routing-type thanks for the feedback :-)
---