Github user graben commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1820#discussion_r164266537 --- Diff: artemis-jms-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/client/ActiveMQSession.java --- @@ -698,8 +699,17 @@ private ActiveMQMessageConsumer createConsumer(final ActiveMQDestination dest, */ if (!response.isExists() || !response.getQueueNames().contains(dest.getSimpleAddress())) { if (response.isAutoCreateQueues()) { + SimpleString queueNameToUse = dest.getSimpleAddress(); + SimpleString addressToUse = queueNameToUse; + RoutingType routingTypeToUse = RoutingType.ANYCAST; + if (CompositeAddress.isFullyQualified(queueNameToUse.toString())) { + CompositeAddress compositeAddress = CompositeAddress.getQueueName(queueNameToUse.toString()); + addressToUse = new SimpleString(compositeAddress.getAddress()); + queueNameToUse = new SimpleString(compositeAddress.getQueueName()); + routingTypeToUse = RoutingType.MULTICAST; --- End diff -- Look at my test case in JIRA ARTEMIS-550 and you'll see that there is still a problem concerning usage of FQQN via core protocol.
---