Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2241
I can't speak the contributor rights and licensing issues as I've not
looked into the fine print on that, but I would say that the comparison to CMS
and NMS isn't a good one since those are both tied directly to the 5.x broker
whereas the pool isn't. The pool is generic and could be used with any JMS
client.
I'm not involved at all with the pool so I can't identify the exact,
original motivations for breaking it into it's own project, but from an
outsider's perspective it makes sense to me. Clearly you disagree, but I'm not
convinced that should stop this example from being merged.
---
