One core bit would be that obviously we should ensure libaio is in disto so it works out the box as it does today. But i took this as given.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: "michael.andre.pearce" <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> Date: 30/01/2019 16:51 (GMT+00:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis Native as a separated project Tbh, i see nothing wrong with making it a mini sub project. If anything having some sub projects is a good thing. Would the supporting java code be moved also? And would we look to make the interfaces more generic? Im keen if we separate something thats currently tighly embedded in artemis, we make sure it is much more re-usable (e.g. even example alternative uses). On that note, i think there are other bits that could be split out, a bit like what occured in activemq5. E.g. spring integration, protocol manager, other extensions And should welcome this a little more with newer extensions or features that enhance activemq but not core broker. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
