Currently it’s used for JNi operations around storage. Mostly libido. But I foresee being used for other cases where we may need JNI.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:53 PM Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> wrote: > What is in the library? > > Art > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:08 AM Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I thought Since the native project had open scope like I'm proposing, > > it would eventually be useful anywhere that needs a JNI library. > > > > But we can go with activemq-artemis-native. That's fine. > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:51 PM jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hey Clebert, > > > > > > This is really cool stuff. But I don't like it being called > > ActiveMQ-native > > > because it will confuse people with ActiveMQ classic (which really is > > > ActiveMQ for now) or that it would even work with ActiveMQ 5.x. I > would > > > recommend retaining the Artemis in the name, or > ActiveMQ-Artemis-native. > > > If/when Artemis becomes ActiveMQ, then that could certainly be an > option > > to > > > drop Artemis. But at this stage I think its too confusing. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from: > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > -- Clebert Suconic
