Thanks Robbie: They do not affect the binary at all, and are minor
issues on the source. So, I am fixing these on this PR:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-native/pull/2

(please if you could review it.. if I missed anything you will
probably be able to spot it on the PR.)

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:29 PM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0 release.
> >
> > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native,
> >
> > Source distribution can be found here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis-native/1.0.0/
> >
> > Maven repository is here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1178
> >
> >
> > The source tag:
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis-native.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0.0
> >
> >
> >
> > Notice this is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis, and the release
> > notes will be part of the main component. And also, the binary here is
> > distributed through maven.
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
> Not a vote as I cant try it out at the moment, though its not binding
> anyway. Just some comments from giving it a quick skim around trivial
> issues that should be fixed for the release if someone finds a
> blocking issue:
>
> - LICENSE contains some incorrect detail, though for a file that
> doesnt actually exist in the release.
> - NOTICE should have the contained name updated to more fully match the 
> release.
> - The README ordering is a bit off. It initially lists a bunch of
> dependencies for you to install, then tells you how to build with
> Docker that presumably means you dont need them installed (but do need
> Docker, which isnt listed), and then after that goes back to giving
> manual build instructions where you would need them installed.
> - The example in the README sets JAVA_HOME to a Java7 install but 8 is 
> required.
>
> Robbie



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to