@Robbie: I will take your findings as -1: Let me explain!
I'm thinking a next release will only happen rarely.. long time from now... So, I will rather fix it now.. it's easy to re-spin now. On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:34 PM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks good. > > They indeed dont affect the binary, and they arent blockers, but do > note the actual release is the source archive. > > Robbie > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 20:15, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Robbie: They do not affect the binary at all, and are minor > > issues on the source. So, I am fixing these on this PR: > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-native/pull/2 > > > > (please if you could review it.. if I missed anything you will > > probably be able to spot it on the PR.) > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:29 PM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0 release. > > > > > > > > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native, > > > > > > > > Source distribution can be found here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis-native/1.0.0/ > > > > > > > > Maven repository is here: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1178 > > > > > > > > > > > > The source tag: > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis-native.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notice this is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis, and the release > > > > notes will be part of the main component. And also, the binary here is > > > > distributed through maven. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0 > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > Not a vote as I cant try it out at the moment, though its not binding > > > anyway. Just some comments from giving it a quick skim around trivial > > > issues that should be fixed for the release if someone finds a > > > blocking issue: > > > > > > - LICENSE contains some incorrect detail, though for a file that > > > doesnt actually exist in the release. > > > - NOTICE should have the contained name updated to more fully match the > > > release. > > > - The README ordering is a bit off. It initially lists a bunch of > > > dependencies for you to install, then tells you how to build with > > > Docker that presumably means you dont need them installed (but do need > > > Docker, which isnt listed), and then after that goes back to giving > > > manual build instructions where you would need them installed. > > > - The example in the README sets JAVA_HOME to a Java7 install but 8 is > > > required. > > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
