Do we have instructions yet so others can update the website? If so, where are they? I wanted to give it a shot real quick locally to make sure things are ok. I would be +1 as long as I am able to make updates, etc.
Also we probably need to start a formal vote on this if you want to push it. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:11 PM <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 i agree it be a great triple whammy to have new releases and new site... > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:21 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > With ActiveMQ 5.15.9 + Artemis 2.7.0, it would be great to have the > website updated this week.. It would make it a great week! > > I don't want to push it.. but it would be nice! > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:29 AM Christopher Shannon > wrote: > > > > Yeah we can deploy now that's fine if people want. My comment wasn't so > > much even about automation but more about just having a way to make > updates > > easily. If we can do that through git PRs then that works as long as > there > > are clear instructions for people to follow for updating and deploying > the > > updates. > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:38 AM Clebert Suconic > > wrote: > > > > > Cant we deploy what we have now manually as rob said and then figure > out > > > automation if neeeed? > > > > > > I don’t see the neee to automate but that doesn’t need to be a single > task. > > > If we want automation we can do that on a second time. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Robbie Gemmell > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I envisaged people would run the site 'build', and check in the > > > > resulting output, e.g. as the Apex project Michael linked to does. > > > > > > > > Though perhaps a little work, it doesnt seem like a massive burden to > > > > run the site build. I'd expect it to be something folks should do > when > > > > making updates to the site anyway, to check changes actually work > > > > before committing them. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 19:45, Justin Bertram > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I added the drop-shadow the the "Active" in the main logo. Let me > know > > > > what > > > > > you think. > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Robbie about removing the PMC and committer details. > It's > > > an > > > > > unnecessary maintenance burden, and a stale website is a bad look. > > > Here's > > > > > what I propose: > > > > > * Fold the board reports and the PMC/committers links under the > > > > "Apache" > > > > > navigation menu. > > > > > * Make the PMC/committers link point to > > > > > https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=activemq > > > > > > > > > > Robbie, the issue I see with propagating changes in the website is > that > > > > > there's an intermediate step where Jekyll needs to render the HTML > from > > > > the > > > > > markdown, includes, scss, etc. I don't understand how that step is > > > going > > > > to > > > > > happen. Ideally it would be an automatic process so that we could > check > > > > in > > > > > markdown changes via GitHub and those changes would be made live > > > > > automatically. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:53 PM Robbie Gemmell < > > > > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > About propagation of changes, what often happens with sites now > is > > > > > > that the website (or main) repository contains an 'asf-site' > branch > > > > > > that in turn has a 'content' sub-directory within it comprising > the > > > > > > live site. Anything outwith that can comprise the site source. > The > > > > > > repo is monitored by gitpubsub and whenever changes are > committed, > > > the > > > > > > contents dir gets synced to the actual webservers automatically. > No > > > > > > build jobs etc needed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 15:38, Justin Bertram > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree we need up-to-date information for > > > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/team/. Bruce, > where's > > > > the > > > > > > > official data on who is a PMC member and who is a committer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I fixed the CMS download issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are the details about the Slack channel? This is the first > > > I've > > > > > > heard > > > > > > > of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added the drop-shadow on the "MQ" because on the ActiveMQ 5 > > > project > > > > > > page > > > > > > > the background behind the image is the same color as the "MQ" > and > > > > > > therefore > > > > > > > it was disappearing. I added the drop-shadow to make it > visible. It > > > > > > > wouldn't be hard to add a drop-shadow to the whole thing, but I > > > > didn't > > > > > > > think the drop-shadow on just the "MQ" looked any stranger > than it > > > > being > > > > > > a > > > > > > > different color in the first place. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One thing I'm not really clear on yet is how modifications > from the > > > > > > > activemq-website repo will be propagated to the actual website. > > > I've > > > > read > > > > > > > about some Apache buildbot thing that might help here, but I > don't > > > > know > > > > > > > much about it yet. Anybody else have any clue on how that's > > > supposed > > > > to > > > > > > > work? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I'm working up a PR right now, but I wanted to get as > much of > > > it > > > > > > right > > > > > > > as I could before I sent it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 6:00 PM Michael André Pearce > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A few bits we need to work on: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we need to update this, it was extracted from current > > > site, > > > > > > but is > > > > > > > > out of date. > > > > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/team/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems we are missing cms download page > > > > > > > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/projects/cms/download/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the contact side, there is now a slack channel this > should be > > > > added, > > > > > > > > and have the same visibility as IRC (could be added later, > but > > > > just to > > > > > > note) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With the hero sections on the logo side, where drop shadow > has > > > been > > > > > > added > > > > > > > > to the letters in MQ for Apache Active MQ, it looks a bit odd > > > just > > > > > > having > > > > > > > > MQ drop shadowed, would it be easy to drop shadow it all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > > > > > >
