Yes, all fixed

And also i review a PR with wrong license headers

Cheers

Emmanuel

On 08/06/2019 23:30, [email protected] wrote:
> Would that also address the other rat failures that Robbie found?
>
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:44 PM +0100, "Emmanuel Hugonnet" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've sent the PR https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/pull/46 and I'll 
> try to have it merged with a release today.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On 07/06/2019 11:53, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>> Here is the RAT output for wildfly-commons 1.5.1.Final (version used
>> in Artemis), from adding the RAT plugin and running "mvn
>> apache-rat:check" on the module:
>> https://paste.apache.org/BzlS
>>
>> 16 files were flagged unknown, 15 of which just have no header (5 look
>> like just empty build marker files), plus the 1
>> CompositeCharSequenceTestCase.java test class Michael noted which has
>> the LGPL header.
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 21:12, Michael André Pearce
>>  wrote:
>>> I haven’t checked all the files, i don’t have time. But simply the parent 
>>> wildfly project is LPGL and I’ve found one file with LGPL, this is a 
>>> concern, and going forwards this is risky as they may move more files from 
>>> Wildfly project into it.
>>>
>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:10, Michael André Pearce  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is a class in there which was taken from wildfly but keeps its gnu 
>>>> license (as it has to)
>>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/blob/d8397e1174a193aaab5db510da514f6039be6742/src/test/java/org/wildfly/common/string/CompositeCharSequenceTestCase.java
>>>>
>>>> As such even so they declare it Apache, it isn’t because inside is code 
>>>> that is LPGL from wildly.
>>>>
>>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Justin Bertram  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This was the dependency added:
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>         org.wildfly.common
>>>>>         wildfly-common
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>> Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See
>>>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/blob/master/LICENSE.
>>>>>
>>>>> I could see your point if a dependency on org.wildfly:wildfly-parent was
>>>>> added as that is LGPL as you noted.
>>>>>
>>>>> At this point I don't see a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:02 PM Michael André Pearce
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wildfly project:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:01, Justin Bertram  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you sure about that? Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See
>>>>>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michael André Pearce
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It’s a category x, in my understanding.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 20:46, Michael André Pearce <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It seems https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2661
>>>>>>>> introduced an LPGL dependency into ActiveMQ Artemis.
>>>>>>>>> Can we please revert this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to