It make sense for the roadmap, may be it could be a dedicated page on the website?
regards, François [email protected] Le 11/07/2019 à 15:41, Bruce Snyder a écrit : > Agreed, a clear roadmap must be defined. We should create a new wiki page > for an overall ActiveMQ project roadmap that includes info for all the > ActiveMQ components (ActiveMQ, ActiveMQ Artemis, ActiveMQ NMS and ActiveMQ > CMS). There is already an ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap wiki page, is this info > still relevant/usable ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+Artemis+Roadmap > )? > > We need to work openly via the dev@activemq list on this roadmap page so > that it is defined in the open, is unambiguous and includes the entire > ActiveMQ community. It's very important that we hear from users of each > component because these folks have various ActiveMQ components deployed in > production and we need to know what is important to them instead of > speaking for them. > > As part of the roadmap discussion, we must also decide if one of the goals > for Artemis is still to be a drop-in replacement for ActiveMQ. I know that > at one time this was the goal, i.e., allow current ActiveMQ users to drop > in Artemis and have everything just continue to work. Is there still value > in this goal? > > Bruce > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:27 AM <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Like wise in a roadmap for our project we need to be also clear on the >> direction for Artemis. >> >> >> >> >> We definitely dont want to be flip flopping. We had spelt out a roadmap >> last year. >> >> >> >> >> The project already did one big flip flop with apollo. It erodes all end >> users trust, and they have no clear direction what they should do. >> >> >> >> >> So i would like to see the total vision and roadmap in any proposal if a >> new roadmap is being presented for the project. So users dont get mixed >> messages >> >> >> >> >> Get Outlook for Android >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 7:17 AM +0100, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Before any votes. I think it needs a little more discussion to see where >> the tide is going. You need to engage people in that discussion. >> >> >> >> >> Likewise i think a little more than just a line or two is needed for a >> proposal, need to be clear who is committing to what and thoughts about >> ensuring clients in cms nms and jms all updated and commitment there. >> >> >> >> >> There is no use in a roadmap with no one committing to the work both >> client and broker side, else its just becomes hot air. >> >> >> >> >> Get Outlook for Android >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:14 AM +0100, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Fair enough. >> >> Anyway, I'm moving forward on 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation >> reviewing/fixing/merging. >> >> About the "roadmap", I will start a formal vote. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 09/07/2019 12:08, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>> There was almost no discussion on the proposals for 5.x. Almost no one >>> responded and there was no consensus so definitely a -1 from me to >> include >>> anything about JMS 2.0, cloud features or any other features like that >> for >>> 5.x on the board report until it is discussed and the community has a >>> consensus. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:34 AM wrote: >>> >>>> There was feedback i gave some on that thread. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Get Outlook for Android >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:43 AM +0100, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It's just worth to mention, there's no feedback for now. >>>> >>>> Anyway, as a community effort, I don't see any blocker. About the >>>> releases, it's straight forward as it's maintenance and improvements on >>>> existing branches. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 9 juil. 2019 à 02:44, à 02:44, Clebert Suconic a écrit: >>>>> I don’t think the community reached a consensus in order to include on >>>>> the >>>>> report. >>>>> >>>>> If you want to mention it on the report mention the discussion didn’t >>>>> reach >>>>> a consensus yet. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Bruce, >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to contribute with the two e-mails sent about ActiveMQ: >>>>>> >>>>>> - 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation >>>>>> - Roadmap proposal (JMS 2.0, JDK 11 support, ...) >>>>>> - Cloud friendly features >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately I don't have the permission to edit the wiki page. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you grant permission to my user ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/07/2019 17:40, Bruce Snyder wrote: >>>>>>> This is a reminder that your contributions to the Board report are >>>>>> urgently >>>>>>> needed this week! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The report is due in two days and currently there have been zero >>>>>>> contributions. Please take a few minutes to report on project >>>>> activity >>>>>>> here: >>>>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511 >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 7:39 AM Bruce Snyder >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> It's time once again to create a report for the ASF Board for July >>>>> 2019. >>>>>>>> Your contribution only takes five minutes, so please report >>>>> project >>>>>>>> activity for any of the ActiveMQ projects on the wiki page below: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511 >>>>>>>> This report is due to by July 10, 2019. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> perl -e 'print >>>>>>>> >>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E);' >>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >>>>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ >>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
