I will do the right thing. I will create a branch called future-master. And ask infra to update everything.
I will send a separate thread with a clear title. On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:42 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > A necessary change would be updating the readme to describe the > updated build + publish process. I've raised a PR against your test > branch with suggested changes: > https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-website/pull/1/files > > Robbie > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 10:33, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Do you mean move things over to the asf-site branch? Seems reasonable > > to me. I'd start a separate thread though giving folks a heads up that > > e.g you will do it tomorrow/some-other-point unless discussed > > otherwise, so its clear when the change might happen and that lazy > > consensus can be taken as only a few folks have commented on this > > thread. > > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 18:02, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Should we move it then ? > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:52 AM Robbie Gemmell < > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > What you did is just what the exiting build script did, so that > should > > > > be fine if it was previously. I tried with and without the > > > > --incremental and it didnt make a difference here (wasn't much > > > > different time wise either). Strange that you saw this, and strange > > > > you now dont, but at least its working now. > > > > > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 22:07, Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I did not see the error again. I guess it was an effect of working > > > > > late hours.. I messed something up. > > > > > > > > > > I was playing with --incremental on jekyll perhaps that's what > caused it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Playing with a single branch would make it a lot easier. It > bothers me > > > > > to keep moving between branches as my IDE gets crazy on indexing > files > > > > > (don't ask.. I prefer IDE than VIM... I use vim emulation on idea > > > > > though ;) ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If more people could double check this is okay.. perhaps we can > > > > > replace asf-site by my test branch. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:09 PM Clebert Suconic > > > > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I copied the folder from the branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out asf-siite > > > > > > Move it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Checkout the test branch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moved it back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 7:31 AM Robbie Gemmell < > > > > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I dont see that happen when I run the build, and hadnt actually > ever > > > > > >> seen the 'typechange' file status before. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The content/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd is actually a > symlink, and > > > > > >> some googling suggests the 'typechange' status mainly happens > when > > > > > >> such link is replaced with an actual file. If I do that > deliberately, > > > > > >> I then see the same status you do. Some posts suggested it can > happen > > > > > >> with certain copy commands, that have dereferenced the link and > copied > > > > > >> the referenced files content. How did you initially populate the > > > > > >> 'content' dir your subsequent status is showing as being > updated? > > > > > >> Running the build afresh, or copying prior build output? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Robbie > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 22:53, Clebert Suconic < > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I have a branch where I'm using a single branch: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-website/tree/test > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > The only concern I have so far is that any time I build, I > get a > > > > > >> > change into a schema: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Changes not staged for commit: > > > > > >> > (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) > > > > > >> > (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in > working > > > > directory) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > typechange: content/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Although I would consider that anyone would check stuff before > > > > committing.. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Any ideas? > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:03 PM Justin Bertram < > jbert...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > If it's simpler and documented that sounds like a win to me. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Justin > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:41 AM Robbie Gemmell < > > > > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 16:47, Clebert Suconic < > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:44 AM Robbie Gemmell < > > > > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > Thats what we do at Qpid and what I've seen other > > > > > >> > > > > > projects do, I find it simpler overall. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Tl;DR: > > > > > >> > > > > I'm all +10000000 on this... what we need to change on > infra. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Can we keep the history from master > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > We wouldnt need to change much to get everything on the > same > > > > branch I > > > > > >> > > > dont think, and it seems like we can do so without infra: > I > > > > just tried > > > > > >> > > > on your last commit as a test and was able to force-push > the > > > > asf-site > > > > > >> > > > branch in the website repo. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > So basically it seems it needs something like: repopulate > the > > > > asf-site > > > > > >> > > > branch (or a test branch) with the master history locally, > > > > simplify > > > > > >> > > > the build script to only build and nothing else, fix up > the > > > > .gitignore > > > > > >> > > > file appropriately, build things, commit, and [force] > push. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Assuming of course others agree that it is what should > happen? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Robbie > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > -- Clebert Suconic
