I'm going to start a new discuss thread on JMS 2.0 in 5.x since there seems to be some confusion on the goals and what is happening after 5.16.0 is done
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to be clear: I wanted to include JMS 2.0 client update in 5.16.0, but > received feedback to focus on 5.16.1 as the main target of 5.16.0 is JDK 11 > support. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 25 juin 2020 à 07:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > > > Hi, > > > > Correct, JMS 2.0 on client side started but planned for 5.16.1 as it > needs deeper tests (so far, so good to me). > > > > The full "inner broker" JMS 2.0 is more for 5.17.0. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > >> Le 25 juin 2020 à 03:05, Christopher Shannon < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> I can chime in here and JB can correct me if I'm mistaken, but as far > as I > >> am aware nothing has been done with Openwire and JMS 2.0 is not part of > >> this release. The JMS 2.0 stuff needs to be clarified to indicate it's > not > >> true JMS 2.0 support as I believe JB was just looking at doing some > basic > >> client changes to make things more compatible on the api side (I'm not > sure > >> exactly but I don't think any new features would be added as part of the > >> spec) > >> > >> As I have pointed out many times on the dev list, adding true JMS 2 > support > >> including all the broker and datastore changes and client side protocol > >> changes would be quite a large undertaking and would take a very long > time > >> to implement. > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:55 PM Michael Pearce < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> HI JB > >>> > >>> Whilst this is cancelled, as per your heads up, you mentioned JMS 2.0 > in > >>> the 5.16.0 release, but i cannot find any JIRA tickets in the release > notes > >>> on this. > >>> > >>> As obviously to support that on openwire (due to extra features), Can > you > >>> point us to the corresponding changes in > >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-openwire-generator to support > >>> those. > >>> > >>> Best > >>> Mike > >>> > >>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 14:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone, > >>>> > >>>> Due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7505 < > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7505> I cancel this > release. > >>>> > >>>> I’m fixing AMQ-7505 and adding rat (to avoid some problem in the > future) > >>>> and I will submit take #2 to vote. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>>> Le 24 juin 2020 à 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> a > >>> écrit > >>>> : > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm submitting (finally ;)) ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release to your vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports JDK > 11. > >>>> The full build with JDK 11 is planned for 5.17.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> It also includes bunch of fixes, improvements and much more. > >>>>> > >>>>> For your information, once this vote will pass, I will create > >>>> activemq-5.16.x branch and I will move master branch to version > 5.17.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12341032 > >>>> < > >>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12341032 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The Maven staging repository is: > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1212/ > >>>> < > >>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1212/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The dist staging repository is: > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.16.0/ < > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.16.0/> > >>>>> > >>>>> Git tag: > >>>>> activemq-5.16.0 > >>>>> > >>>>> Please vote to approve this release: > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release > >>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > >>>>> > >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks ! > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > >
