However, I agree to change "slave" to "worker". That is reasonable.
Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月14日周二 上午11:17写道： > Hi. > If you really think "master" is something you cannot accept, then you > might argue with github first. > after all their default git branch name is "master", and github have far > more user than ActiveMQ. > > Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月14日周二 上午11:03写道： > >> Someone mentioned use of the terms 'primary' and 'backup' in the private >> list and I liked that suggestion. I'm not wed to any terms necessarily, so >> if Artemis is already using the terms 'live' and 'backup', I'm ok with >> that >> in ActiveMQ. >> >> Bruce >> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:42 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for kicking this off, Bruce. >> > >> > Among other things the Jira [1] says: >> > >> > > 'master' and 'slave' should be replaced with the terms 'primary,' >> > 'secondary,' 'tertiary,' etc. >> > >> > I would offer "live" and "backup" as suitable replacements for "master" >> and >> > "slave" respectively. The Artemis code and documentation already use >> "live" >> > and "backup" in many places although some instances of "master" and >> "slave" >> > do exist. Aside from the fact that they're already in use I like the >> fact >> > that they're relatively short and they clearly capture the underlying >> > functional semantic. In my opinion the terms "primary," "secondary," >> etc. >> > are actually a bit vague and they're certainly quite a bit longer which >> > isn't a huge deal but it adds up when writing tests, documentation, etc. >> > >> > >> > Justin >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514 >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:04 PM Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Given the racial charged nature of certain terms in today's world, I >> feel >> > > that action should be taken to change any such terms in all the >> ActiveMQ >> > > projects. Examples include 'master,' 'slave,' 'whitelist' and >> > 'blacklist'. >> > > >> > > It doesn't matter where these terms originated or how long they have >> been >> > > used in computer science. I have friends who feel that these terms are >> > > offensive and present a barrier to entry to some. So, I would prefer >> that >> > > they no longer be used anywhere in the ActiveMQ project. The simple >> fact >> > is >> > > that changing these terms will not change the functionality of the >> > > features. Furthermore, compared to many other prominent projects >> > throughout >> > > the open source community, ActiveMQ is late to the game on this point. >> > > >> > > So, I have created the following JIRA Issue to encapsulate this work. >> I >> > > have not assigned any components simply because this should span all >> > > sub-projects and documentation: >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514 >> > > >> > > I have already begun work on this effort in a branch in my own fork of >> > the >> > > activemq repo. This is to facilitate an eventual pull request to the >> > > ActiveMQ project. Anyone who would like to join me in this effort >> please >> > > reply to this message. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > perl -e 'print >> > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" >> );' >> > > http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >> > > >> > >> >> >> -- >> perl -e 'print >> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' >> http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >> >
